Anatomy Atlases(tm) : A digital library of anatomy information

Home | About | FAQ | Reviews | Search

Anatomy Atlases: Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation: Opus V: Skeletal System: Variations in Size and in Symmetry of Foramina of the Human Skull

Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation: Opus V: Skeletal Systems: Cranium

Variations in Size and in Symmetry of Foramina of the Human Skull

Unpublished study by Jennifer K. Berge and Ronald A. Bergman

Ronald A. Bergman, PhD
Adel K. Afifi, MD, MS
Ryosuke Miyauchi, MD

Peer Review Status: Internally Peer Reviewed


Table 1
Paired Foramina

Foramen

Average Size (mm)

Largest Size (mm)

Smallst Size (mm)

Anterior Ethmoid

2.27 x 1.14 8 x 3 0.64 x 0.64

Carotid Canal

7.13 x 5.29 12 x 5 5.5 x 4

Foramen Ovale

7.11 x 3.60 8 x 7 5 x 2

Foramen Rotundum

3.26 x 2.66 4.5 x 3.5 2 x 2

Foramen Spinosum

2.39 x 1.96 4 x 3 1 x 1

Greater Palatine

4.01 x 2.16 8 x 3 1.67 x 1.67

Hiatus for the Greater Petrosal

0.77 x 0.68 3 x 2 0.3 x 0.3

Hiatus for the Lesser Petrosal

0.37 x 0.37 0.83 x 0.83 0.3 x 0.3

Hypoglossal (Exocranial)

4.66 x 3.21 7.5 x 5 2 x 0.92

Infraorbital Foramen

3.42 x 2.40 6 x 4 1.67 x 1.67

Innominate

2.13 x 1.1 4 x 3 0.3 x 0.3

Internal Acoustic Meatus

4.27 x 3.78 6 x 5 3 x 3

Lacrimal

0.71 x 0.67 4 x 1 0.3 x 0.3

Lesser Palatine

0.86 x 0.73 3.5 x 1.5 0.3 x 0.3

Mandibular

3.29 x 3.51 6.5 x 6 1 x 1

Mastoid Foramen

1.26 x 1.09 5.5 x 5 0.3 x 0.3

Mental Foramen

2.43 x 1.76 5.5 x 3 0.52 x 0.52

Nasolacrimal

5.30 x 4.45 7 x 7 3.5 x 3.5

Optic Foramen

5.02 x 4.16 7 x 5 3.5 x 3

Parietal foramina permagna

0.67 x 0.67 1.67 x 1.67 0.3 x 0.3

Post. Condylar

2.94 x 2.56 6 x 4.5 0.41 x 0.41

Posterior Ethmoid

1.23 x 0.82 4 x 1.5 0.41 x 0.41

Stylomastoid

1.66 x 1.56 2.5 x 2 1.07 x 1.07

Superior Alveolar

0.57 x 0.57 1.07 x 1.07 0.3 x 0.3

Superior Orbital

1.85 x 1.15 3.5 x 1.5 0.52 x 0.52

Trochlear

0.76 x 0.73 1.28 x 0.83 0.3 x 0.3

Vesalius

0.79 x 0.59 3 x 2 0.3 x 0.3

Unpaired Foramina

Foramen Magnum

33.8 x 28.3 41 x 53 24 x 23

Incisive Canal Length

2.76 x 2.39 5.5 x 4 0.46 x 0.46

Canal

Average Length (mm) Longest Length (mm) Shortest Length (mm)

Infraorbital Canal

27.7 35 22

There was no significant difference between the average size of the foramina on the right and the average size of the foramina on the left, for any pair of foramina. Therefore, the "average size" was calculated by taking the average of both the right and left for each pair of foramina. When multiple openings were present for a foramen, all the openings were measured and used in the calculation of the average size.

Table 2
Symmetry of Paired Foramina

Foramen

Absent Bilateral

Present Unilateral

Bilateral Same Size

Bilateral >0.5mm Diff

Anterior Ethmoid

0/90(0%) 1/90(1%) 65/90(72%) 24/90(27%)

Carotid Canal

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 77/100/(77%) 23/100(23%)

Foramen Ovale

0/96(0%) 0/96(0%) 40/96(42%) 56/96(58%)

Foramen Rotundum

0/98(0%) 0/98(0%) 90/98(92%) 8/98(8%)

Foramen Spinosum

0/92(0%) 1/99(1%) 77/92(84%) 14/92(15%)

Greater Palatine

0/99(0%) 0/99(0%) 67/99(68%) 32/99(32%)

Hiatus for the Greater Petrosal

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 87/100(87%) 13/100(13%)

Hiatus for the Lesser Petrosal

15/100(15%) 11/100(11%) 72/100(72%) 2/100(2%)

Hypoglassal (Exocranial)

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 41/100(41%) 59/100(100%)

Infraorbital

0/98(0%) 0/98(0%) 73/98(74%) 25/98(26%)

Innominate

65/100(65%) 17/100(17%) 9/100(9%) 9/100(9%)

Internal Acoustic Meatus

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 91/100(91%) 9/100(9%)

Lacrimal

28/100(28%) 31/100(31%) 35/100(35%) 6/100(6%)

Lesser Palatine

0/99(0%) 3/99(3%) 77/99(78%) 19/99(19%)

Mandibular

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 92/100(92%) 8/100(8%)

Mastoid

1/99(1%) 10/99(10%) 47/99(47%) 41/99(41%)

Mental

0/100(0%) 0/100(0%) 80/100(80%) 20/100(20%)

Nasolacrimal

0/46(0%) 0/46(0%) 38/46(83%) 8/46(17%)

Optic Canal

0/97(0%) 0/97(0%) 82/97(85%) 15/97(15%)

Parietal

20/99(20%) 30/99(30%) 33/99(33%) 16/99(16%)

Post. Condylar

10/100(10%) 36/100(36%) 18/100(18%) 36/100(36%)

Posterior Ethmoid

0/98(0%) 0/98(0%) 78/98(80%) 20/98(20%)

Stylomastoid

0/99(0%) 0/99(0%) 98/99(99%) 1/99(1%)

Superior Alveolar

1/91(1%) 0/91(0%) 86/91(95%) 4/91(4%)

Superior Orbital

50/100(50%) 31/100(31%) 14/100(14%) 5/100(5%)

Trochlear

92/100(92%) 6/100(6%) 2/100(2%) 0/100(0%)

Vesalius

41/100(41%) 24/100(24%) 25/100(25%) 10/100(10%)

Infraorbital Canal

0/98(0%) 0/98(0%) 64/98(65%) 34/98(35%)

Although 100 skulls were examined, not every foramen in the skull was useable due to breakage or inaccessibility. The number of useable skulls for each pair of foramina is given as the denominator. The four colums represent:

  1. the number of skulls in which neither foramina of the pair was present
  2. the number of skulls in which only one of the two foramina of the pair was present
  3. the number of skulls in which both of the foramina of the pair were present and the same size within 0.5 mm
  4. the number of skulls in which both of the foramina were present but there was greater than 0.5 mm difference in the size of the two foramina.

Variation in the Shape of the Superior Orbital Fissure


References

Bergman R.A., Thompson S.A., Afifi A.K., Saadeh F.A. (1988) Compendium of Human Anatomic Variation;World Literature, Catalog and Atlas. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich and Baltimore.

Berlis, A., Putz, R. and M. Schumacher. (1992) Direct and CT measurements of canals and foramina of the skull base. The British Journal of Radiology 65:653-661.

Berry A.C., Berry R.J. (1967) Epigenetic variation in the human cranium. J. Anat. 101:361-379.

Berry A.C. (1975) Factors affecting the incidence of non-metrical skeletal variants. I Anat. 120, 3:519-535.

Boyd G.I. (1930) Emilssary foramina of cranium in man and anthropoids. J. Anat. 65:108-121.

Coin C.G., Malkasian D.R. (197 1) Foramen magnum. In: Newton T.H., Potts D.G., eds. Radiology of the skull and brain. St. Louis: Mosby, 1:1 275-286.

Currarino G,, Maravilla K.R., Salver K.E. (1985) Transsphenoidal canal and its pathologic implications, ANJR 6:39-43.

Curtin A.D., Williams R., Johnson J. (1984) CT of perineural tumor extension: pterygopalatine fossa, AJNR 5:731-737.

Goalwain H.A. (1927ab.) One thousand optic canals, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 89:1745. -- (1927b) The profile roentgenogram of the optic canal, Am. J. Roentgenol. 17:573.

Henderson W.R. (1966) A note on the relationship of the human maxillary nerve to the cavernous sinus and to an emissary sinus passing through the foramen ovale. J. Anat. 100:905-908.

Lanzieri C.F., Duchesneau P.M., Rosenbloom S.A., Smith A.S., Rosenbaum A.E. (1988) The signficance of asymmetry of the foramen of Vesalius. AJNR 9:1201-1204.

Le Double A.F. (1903) Traité des variations des os du crâne de l'homme er de leur signification au pont de vue de l'anthroppologie zoologique,Paris, Vigot Frères.

Lindblom K. (1936) A roentgenographic study of the vascular channels of the skull, Acta Radiol. supp 30.

Pandolfa, I., Gaeta M., Blandino A., Longo M. (1987) The radiology of the pterygoid canal: normal and pathological findings, AJNR 8:479-483.

Radoïévitch A., Jovanovich A., Lotritch N. (1956) La morphologie dur trou ovale et les rapports du nerf maxilaire inférieur avec le sinus sphénoidal, Rev. Laryng. 77:11-19.

Russell F. (1900) Studies in cranial variations, Amer. Nat. 34:737-747.

Shapiro R., Robinson F. (1967) The foramina of the middle fossa: a phylogenetic, anatomic and, pathologic study, Amer. J. Roentgen. 101:779-794.

Sondheimer F.K. (1971) Basal foramina and canals. In, Newton T.H., Potts D.G., eds. Radiology of the skull and brain. St..Louis: Mosby 1:1 287-347.

Sperino, -. (1884) Circolazione Venosa del Dapo. Turin (cited by Boyd 1903).

Streit H. (1903) Über otologisch wichtige Anomalien der Hirnsinus, über acessorische sinus und bedeutendere Venenverbindungen. Arch. Ohrenheilk. 58:85-128 and 161-167.

Wang T., Kuo K., Shih C., Ho L., Liu J. (1988) Assessment of the relative locations of the greater palatine foramen in adult Chinese skulls, Acta Anat. 132:182-186.

Wood-Jones F. (1931) The non-metrical morphological characteris of the skull as criteria for racial diagnosis. Part 1. General discussion of the morphological characters employed in racial diagnosis, J. Anat. 65:179-195.

Section Top | Title Page
Home | About Us | FAQ | Reviews | Contact Us | Search

Anatomy Atlases is curated by Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D. and Ronald A. Bergman, Ph.D.

Please send us comments by filling out our Comment Form.

All contents copyright © 1995-2024 the Author(s) and Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D. All rights reserved.

"Anatomy Atlases", the Anatomy Atlases logo, and "A digital library of anatomy information" are all Trademarks of Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.

Anatomy Atlases is funded in whole by Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D. Advertising is not accepted.

Your personal information remains confidential and is not sold, leased, or given to any third party be they reliable or not.

The information contained in Anatomy Atlases is not a substitute for the medical care and advice of your physician. There may be variations in treatment that your physician may recommend based on individual facts and circumstances.

URL: http://www.anatomyatlases.org/